*** Welcome to Plebis — explore your favorite projects and proposals *** Authorize Indexer Performance Upgrade v1.6.1 • Injective Protocol • 0h 0m left *** Security validation for InjHub proposal rendering • Injective Protocol • 0h 0m left *** Migrate ServiceRegistry contract • Axelar Network • 0h 0m left *** Update Oracle Feeds to Pyth Pro for Various Perpetual Markets on Injective Exchange dApps Batch 2 • Stargaze • 0h 0m left *** Update Oracle Feeds for Various Perpetual Markets on Injective Exchange dApps • Injective Protocol • 28h left *** Fund Hypha to operate the Hub's public testnet program for 2026/2027 • Cosmos Hub • 120h left
Injective Protocol Logo

Injective Protocol

#657

PASSED

Allowlist New SEDA Fast Program ID

Proposal Type: MsgUpdateParams

Proposal Contents (*the original text from the proposer)

SEDA Fast is used to support low-latency oracle updates on Injective. To support the rollout of additional SEDA Fast feeds on chain, the oracle module needs to allowlist an additional program ID that can be used for SEDA Fast feed verification.

This proposal updates the Injective oracle module parameters to add the simple SEDA Fast program ID 95417c83b9fb118996db564d3efbcf69ac78b291e7faba4704e95fcd33ba3ba0. All other oracle module parameters are preserved.

Actions:

  • By voting yes on this proposal, you support allowlisting the new SEDA Fast program ID for pushing additional SEDA Fast feeds on chain.
  • By voting no on this proposal, you do not support allowlisting the new SEDA Fast program ID.
  • By voting no with veto, you find this proposal to be spam/irrelevant/malicious to governance, and contribute to burning the 100 INJ deposit if NoWithVeto votes are greater than one-third of the total voting power.
  • By voting abstain, you wish to contribute to quorum while formally declining to vote either for or against the proposal.

Disclosure: I am a member of the Injective Labs team.

Voting Results

Status: Quorum Met
(48.20% of the required 33.40%)
Tokens Voted
27,294,529
Yes
17,476,161
64.0%
No
1,029
0.0%
No With Veto
13
0.0%
Abstain
9,817,326
36.0%

Vox Populi

Community discussions related to the proposal.

There do not appear to be any discussions on this proposal at this time.